• Search

Clothes take-off at airport

Date published: 13 October 2009

A human X–ray machine which produces “naked” images of passengers was introduced at Manchester Airport today, enabling staff to instantly spot any hidden weapons or explosives.

The full body scanner will also show any breast enlargements, false limbs, piercings, and a clear outline of passengers’ private parts.

Some travellers might not want to be scanned because of the graphic nature of the images, bosses admit.

They can refuse to undergo the virtual strip search at Terminal 2, opting for the traditional “pat down” search instead.

But the black and white image will only be seen by one officer in a remote location before it is deleted, Sarah Barrett, head of customer experience at the airport, said.

“Most of our customers do not like the traditional “pat down” search, they find it too intrusive, but they still want to be kept safe.

“This scanner completely takes away the hassle of needing to undress. The images are not erotic or pornographic and they cannot be stored or captured in anyway,” she said.

The scanner, made by the firm RapiScan Systems, makes the check–in process much quicker for passengers, who will not have to remove their coats, shoes or belts.

Frequent flyers do not need to worry about radiation from the low–level X–ray — a dental X–ray transmits 20,000 times more radiation.

“Passengers can go through this machine 5,000 times a year each without worrying, it is super safe and the amount of radiation transmitted is tiny,” Ms Barrett said.

The Department for Transport will decide whether to install the scanners — which cost £80,000 each — permanently at the end of the trial, which is expected to last for a year.

The scanners were also trialled at Heathrow Airport in 2004.

Electromagnetic waves are beamed on to passengers while they stand in a booth, and a virtual three-dimensional “naked” image is created from the reflected energy.

Security officials in the United States have pioneered their use at New York and Los Angeles airports, and they are gradually being rolled out in other airports in the country.

Comments

I don't think there should be any exceptions: if these things are to be used everyone should pass through them unless there are good medical reasons for not doing so. Offering a 'pat down' search seems to give a convenient chance/possibility for someone determined to do something terrible.

Having seen some of the people using the airport, how long will it be before a member of staff seeks compensation for the things he/she has to look at?

“Passengers can go through this machine 5,000 times a year without worrying, it is super safe & the amount of radiation transmitted is tiny,” Ms Barrett said, blinking her third eye. Uncoiling one of her tentacles she shyly reached into her armpit & scratched her nose. 'Must dash', she cried and with a cheeky twitch of her prehensile tail shot off down the corridor at such speed that all three legs were a blur. All that remained was a fishy aroma & a faintly glowing patch where she had stood.

 

Have Your Say

Post New Comment

 

To post a comment you must first Log in.  Don't have an account? Register Now!

 

 

Browsing with a mobile? Try our mobile website »