Advertisement
CCTV isn’t working, says campaign group
Reporter: Richard Hooton
Date online: 04 January 2010
COUNCIL chiefs are reviewing the effectiveness of CCTV cameras in Oldham saying they don’t want to become a “Big Brother” authority.
The pledge came after campaigners complained that councils are growing more invasive but increasing CCTV is not stopping or solving crime.
They say the number of cameras controlled by local councils has tripled nationally in the last 10 years from 21,000 to 60,000.
The research conducted by Big Brother Watch — a new campaign fighting intrusions on privacy and protecting liberties — shows Oldham has 78 CCTV cameras, which works out at 0.4 per 1,000 people for its 217,273-strong population.
Portsmouth and Nottinghamshire Councils are in control of the most CCTV cameras with 1,454 each. Residents in the Outer Hebrides are the most watched people in the UK with 8.3 council controlled CCTV cameras for every 1,000 people.
Alex Deane, director of Big Brother Watch, said: “Local councils across Britain are creating enormous networks of CCTV surveillance at great expense, but the evidence for the ability of CCTV to deter or solve crimes is sketchy at best.
“The quality of footage is frequently too poor to be used in courts, the cameras are often turned off to save money and control rooms are rarely manned 24-hours-a-day.
“With crime on the increase, it is understandable that some people want more CCTV, but we would all feel safer with more police on the beat, there would be fewer crimes and those crimes that do occur would be solved faster.”
Councillor Rod Blyth, Oldham Council’s Cabinet member for people and communities, said: “Our borough has 78 CCTV cameras which — given its geographical size — is not a large number.
“When deployed correctly, CCTV cameras can assist law enforcement and also help to reassure local communities. We are, however, currently in the middle of carrying out a review of all these cameras to measure and consider their effectiveness.”
Comments
Obviously Big Brother watch campaigns against the use of CCTV and Oldham coucil are jumping on the bandwagon and looking to do cost cutting with the aid of a crackpot campaign against CCTV. The idea of CCTV is to deter people from committing crime, secondary use is to detect what are they going to replace it with?
CCTV is only a effective as its operators.
It does not matter how many cameras there are in Oldham.
The real question is are they working and is the control centre manned 24/7.
If so how is it that very little crime is being detected with them, if this is not the case please could somebody from the Council refute this by publishing figures on arrests/sentencing.
And an even bigger waste of Local Authority money was that spent on PCSOs, please evaluate their effectiveness, or try to find out what they do.
The presence of CCTV cameras doesn't stop crime. The number of crimes solved depends on crimes being committed where they are, and no hoodies being worn!! Only 78? There are a lot more than that!!
If anything the cctv should be extended to cover all district centres – not just as a crime deterrent but a working tool that gives reassurance, gathers intelligence and supports the police. It’s clear that cctv can cover more ground than a bobby and can give greater evidential support.
Have Your Say






Typical Oldham Council ! Spend a fotune on a 'state of the art' digital CCTV system then think about getting rid - just like the Pennine Way hotel purchase & sale. A Joke !!! CCTV 'Partnership' working MUST be helping detect Crime & Disorder in Oldham. All in the name of saving brass !!! Very short sighted. Again !!!!!
By Ultravox80 @ 04/01/2010 12:31:12