• Search

Gran’s death: the failings revealed

Reporter: Richard Hooton
Date online: 24 June 2010

36 hours before given treatment :: ‘Deficiency’ in recording food intake

A SENIOR doctor admitted a grandmother’s death may have been avoided if a hospital had acted sooner to ensure she was properly fed.

An inquest at Oldham magistrates court yesterday heard that Shirley Finan (71), of Incline Road, Hollinwood, died from multi-organ failure resulting from a clostridium difficile (C diff) infection.

But her family uncovered failings in her care at the Royal Oldham Hospital and are now considering whether to take action over neglect, saying she died because of malnutrition.

Consultant Dr Samuel Solomon admitted that food charts had not been recorded properly and more could have been done to get the retired warehouse operative to eat.

Mrs Finan was admitted on August 7 last year with cellulitis, a skin infection, and treated with antibiotics before being released a week later.

She was readmitted on September 2 with stomach problems and tests revealed the next day she had a C-diff infection. But it was 36 hours before she was given treatment.

She was hardly eating or drinking and two unsuccessful attempts were made on September 22 to insert a tube into her stomach to feed her. She worsened and died on September 25.

But her family say she did not appear well enough to be initially discharged from hospital and was still suffering from diarrhoea, a sign of C diff, and had told a nurse.

Daughter Beverley Finan, from Failsworth, said her mum wasn’t eating as she was celiac, requiring a gluten-free diet, but the hospital could not accommodate her needs.

She was also scared to eat as staff were not prompt in getting her to the toilet. She had also fallen on several occasions, including badly gashing her head.

Dr Solomon accepted her point that staff should have told them their mum was not eating so they could have intervened.

He said she had been discharged as observations two days before showed she was mobile and there were no problems and no record of her having diarrhoea.

Dr Solomon accepted treatment should have started earlier but said the delay did not contribute to her death. Nurses had tried to encourage her to eat and drink but could not force her.

He said: “I wholly understand there has been a deficiency in the recording of your mum’s food intake and if we had acted earlier then the outcome could have been different.”

But he could not say if she would have been saved.

He said he would take up with nurses the importance of food charts being properly kept and interventions put in place.

He said: “Your mother was very ill and we did the best we could to treat her medical problems, unfortunately we were unsuccessful.”

Coroner Simon Nelson said he was grateful for the unusual tenacity of the family.

He said they had raised two matters; That it’s important that someone on a specific diet is catered for and that inadequate record keeping had contributed towards deficiencies in care and it was crucial the hospital dealt with the problem. He said if there had been evidence of a link between the failings and the death he would have given a verdict of neglect.

Instead, he recorded a narrative verdict, saying death was by “reason of recognised complications of necessary therapeutic intervention.

Comments

Sadly this sort of story is all too common and will,I'm afraid,continue to be so.I qualified as a nurse in 1979 at the old Boundary Park Hospital and from day 1 it was instilled in us that our patients always came first.Over the years nurse training has been taken off the wards and into the classroom with the result nurses consider themselves above actually touching the people they are supposed to be looking after. This state of affairs will get worse now that all nurses have to be graduates.

My utmost sympathy to the family involved. Our mother died five years ago in very similar circumstances - obviously no lessons have been learnt - even though promises were made that things would change - we can see that they haven't!! SHAME ON YOU. (We sued the hospital).

What a tragedy, and it sounds like it could have been avoided if the hospital had taken more care of this lady. It makes one frightened of being admitted to such an establishment.
Sueing the hospital is fine for families who seek revenge. But I always think that it will not bring their loved one back..and it won't end their heartbreak if they receive a sum of money.
I also wonder if it will affect the welfare of patients if the hospital have big payouts to make? Or will insurance cover it?

Broady - It certainly wasn't revenge and if you could have seen how much our mum suffered you wouldn't have left it alone. We know we can't bring her back and no it doesn't end the heartbreak - but the way she was treated in hospital was apalling. We hoped that the hospital would take notice of our complaints (we had meetings with the Nursing Mangager and the Consultant) - and in the five years that has passed - it's obvious from this that they haven't.

 

Have Your Say

Post New Comment

 

To post a comment you must first Log in.  Don't have an account? Register Now!

 

 

Browsing with a mobile? Try our mobile website »