• Search

Man jailed over 3million porn images

Date published: 10 January 2012

AN OLDHAM man who became addicted to pornography, was found to have a staggering three million images stored on his computer, a court was told.

Kris Hardman (37) had so many indecent and vile pictures downloaded to his hard drive, that police were able to view only a fraction of them.

Jailing him for ten months, judge Peter Laking told him: “On any view, you had a huge number of such images.

“For the protection of the public, and particularly children, the courts must make clear that offences of this type cannot and will not be tolerated.

“For every indecent image and for every indecent video of a child, there will be a child victim.

“Day in and day out, children are sexually abused to feed this market of indecent images for people like you.”

Lisa Boocock prosecuting, had told Manchester’s Minshull Street Crown Court that police had gone to Hardman’s address on Middleton Road, Royton, on November 24, 2010, armed with a warrant following intelligence that he had accessed extreme porn.

He immediately admitted what he had been doing, and told officers he spent up to five hours a day viewing such vile pictures on the internet.

The court was told that there were so many that around 2.8 million of the images could not be viewed.

Of those that were, more than 61,000 were still and moving pictures graded at the lowest level one, 65 at level two, 76 at level three, 77 at level four, and 56 still images at the highest level five.

They ranged from still poses involving young females to pictures of young girls aged 11-13 involved in sex acts with males, and others involving bondage pictures of girls aged as young as ten.

The court was told that there were in addition, 231 images classed as extreme porn, including pictures of women with animals.

Mark Fireman defending, said Hardman had been extremely frank with police officers when confronted with what he had done.

He said he admitted that he got a form of sexual gratification from looking at the pictures, that he did not get from actual relationships.

Mr Fireman said: “It appears that people can become immune to pornography, and start looking for more and more extreme images to feed their addiction.”

He said his client had expressed remorse for what he had done, and shown a willingness to overcome the addiction.

Hardman had pleaded guilty to 16 offences of making indecent images; five offences of possessing indecent images, and six offences of possessing extreme pornographic images.

He was told he will serve half his ten-month sentence in custody, and the remainder on licence.

He has been disqualified from working with children indefinitely, and will be subject to the Sexual Offences Prevention Order for ten years.

Comments

I despair, day after day we hear of these individuals receiving only a slap of the wrists. What about the people that live near these perverts that have children is there no legal consideration for these families and the anxiety they may feel for their children?Time to start locking up these individuals for a very long time after first castrating them.

The law needs a serious looking at. 10 months?! People get more time for petty crimes. Disgusting is the only word I can sum this up as that is suitable for an online comment.

These people are sick scum,
They do it because they know they will get away with it.
10 months is nothing,

No wonder people take the law into their own hands.

Unreal, 10 months. Did the Judge actually know what was going on. Time for an overhaul of our justice system as it only seems to protect the criminals.

5 months in custody?? Then he'll be free to live a normal life around children.

The justice system has it's priorities totally wrong. You'd get longer for tax evasion!!!!

I live next door to a man who was caught for the same things about 10 yrs ago. he now lives there again as he ownes the house. its a terrace. he can live there because he has rights yet we will never be able to sell our house and move. we want to start a family but how can we bring a little girl (because thats what her liked) up in a house next to someone like that??? Where are my rights? Especially when he has cameras in his windows and the police allow him to have them!

I think this just shows what modern society is coming to - and Royton is on a slippery slope. I blame the Labour government and their ability to turn us into a pacifistic society.

 

Have Your Say

Post New Comment

 

To post a comment you must first Log in.  Don't have an account? Register Now!

 

 

Browsing with a mobile? Try our mobile website »