Firm opposition to C-charge plan

THERE is significant opposition among Greater Manchester Chamber members to the congestion charge proposals, according to a survey of the chamber’s 5,400 businesses on the proposals being put forward for the Transport Innovation Fund.

A number of key issues emerged from the 826 members who responded, representing 15 per cent of the total membership:

::65 per cent of respondents believe the current level of congestion on Greater Manchester roads is high.

::67.3 per cent believe it will increase in the next five years.

::33 per cent believe this is increasing their costs but 49 per cent say there is no effect to them.

::50 per cent viewed the proposed public transport improvements positively.

::60 per cent stated that public transport in Greater Manchester is poor.

When asked about the TIF package, 72 per cent did not view the proposed congestion charge as an acceptable trade off for the investment in public transport and predicted reduction in levels of congestion, while 63 per cent are opposed to congestion charging in principle.

Voting in the congestion charge referendum closes tomorrow, with the result announced on Friday.

Commenting on the survey results, Chamber chief executive Angie Robinson said: “We had hoped to have a much higher response from members, as this is such a hot topic.

“What is very clear is that for many businesses congestion is a problem and they believe it will get worse. Also, most businesses believe our public transport is poor and half of the respondents view the proposed transport improvements positively.

“But there is very significant opposition towards the congestion charge proposal. Clearly these businesses are not convinced that this TIF package is right for them.

“If we want Greater Manchester to be at the forefront of the economy, particularly when we come out of the current downturn, we will need good public transport to save time and money and benefit employees and businesses alike.

“As the TIF package is the only deal on the table currently, what alternatives would be acceptable to fund the improvements that are sought if this is rejected?

“Interestingly, 40 per cent of respondents said that if the charge did come in they would adapt by changing their delivery and meeting times, and 30 per cent would introduce more flexible working.

“The referendum will be the deciding factor in this issue and we would urge business to make sure they examine all the facts and as residents, make sure they cast their vote.”